Talk:Acer saccharinum

Merge

Anyone want to say why they thought silver and sugar maple should be merged? They are two completely different species, both with decent pages -ChristopherM 01:52, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Freeman maple

I'd like to propose that Freeman maple should have its own page. It should tie as closely to Acer rubrum as to A. saccharinum, and a separate page would allow expansion. Nadiatalent (talk) 14:23, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

Swamp Maple

I have added swamp maple as another "common" name for silver maple. I can't give a citation for this addition except to say that that is what my father called it when I was growing up in Eastern Ontario. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.114.22.179 (talk) 11:31, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

CItation found. Now the only one without a citation is Creek Maple. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 13:05, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Acer saccharinum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040816112718/http://www.hort.uconn.edu/Plants/a/acesac/acesac1.html to http://www.hort.uconn.edu/plants/a/acesac/acesac1.html
• Added archive https://archive.is/20060924004332/http://wildwnc.org/trees/Acer_saccharinum.html to http://wildwnc.org/trees/Acer_saccharinum.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:02, 6 December 2017 (UTC)