Talk:Abusir Papyri

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Missing Informations

edit

This article is mentioned in List of ancient Egyptian papyri, however the institution and ref# is missing in this list. Now in this article are a lot of references, some information about the excavations, but very little informations about the papyri themselves. Main topics:

  • A list of the most important papyri is missing
  • There are several findigs at different places of the site. Do they belong together or are they of different ages?
  • What happened to the fragments? Are they scattered over the world, lost and forgotten?
  • At least some of the material must be published somewhere and translated into modern languages.
  • First editors?
  • No text editions mentioned (broken weblinks?)
  • No institution mentioned, that keeps the fragments
  • No reference numbers of the libraries that keep the fragments
  • No information about the treatment of the fragments
  • Some of the Weblinks are broken
  • The importance of the papyri for research is not clear

So, whoever can add some information is welcome. --Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 09:09, 22 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Abusir Papyri. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:55, 25 June 2017 (UTC)Reply