Talk:Abrahams Creek/GA1

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Sainsf in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 10:49, 28 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi! Will get to this in a few days. Sainsf <^>Feel at home 10:49, 28 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

  • Any linking possible in the names of the major soils and rock formations?
  • Done.
  • What is "Mohican"?
  • Linked for a second time.
  • You may link the terms linked in the lead again in the main text.
  • Done.
  • At present, Abrahams Creek has no officially named tributaries As of when exactly?
  • As of now.
  • A note on what "impaired" means here? it is not considered by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection to be impaired
  • Should be apparent to anyone who knows what the word "impaired" means. It's not a rare word.
  • Use convert templates for "cubic feet per second" and "milligrams per liter"?
  • Done.
  • Can "sediment" be linked in the lead as well?
  • Done.
  • "Mouth" is linked way too late.
  • It's linked in the infobox.
  • Are "pond" and "flooding" not too common to be linked?
  • It's an edge case really, but removed.
  • Abrahams Creek Watershed Assessment and Project Prioritization Is this a report or a book? State this clearly.
  • It's the reference, and I don't particularly think it needs to be stated.

Thanks for your cooperation. I believe the article meets the GA criteria now. Pleased to promote this. Great job! Sainsf <^>Feel at home 07:21, 4 April 2016 (UTC)Reply