This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Abraham O. Woodruff article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
A fact from Abraham O. Woodruff appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 22 September 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
DYK nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 22:24, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that Abraham O. Woodruff practiced plural marriage 11 years after his father, Wilford Woodruff, issued the 1890 Manifesto that banned the institution? Source: "That Owen entered into a post-Manifesto polygamous relationship in 1901 is ironic, of course, because it was his own father who had issued the 1890 Manifesto proclaiming the end of plural marriage." ([1])
- ALT1:... that Abraham O. Woodruff married a second wife 11 years after his father, Wilford Woodruff, issued the 1890 Manifesto that banned the practice of plural marriage? Source: "That Owen entered into a post-Manifesto polygamous relationship in 1901 is ironic, of course, because it was his own father who had issued the 1890 Manifesto proclaiming the end of plural marriage." ([2])
- Reviewed: NZS 3604
5x expanded by Cstickel(byu) (talk). Self-nominated at 18:41, 13 August 2021 (UTC).
- General eligibility:
- New enough:
- Long enough:
- Other problems:
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook eligibility:
- Cited:
- Interesting:
- Other problems:
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: I'm not sure whether two users can take credit for reviewing the same article, but I'll assume it was in good faith and count it as a QPQ. Nice work! We're good to go. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 20:43, 13 August 2021 (UTC)