Talk:Abies alba

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Imerologul in topic Etymology

name edit

shouldn't the title name be the english one, in stead of the scientific?Mweites (talk) 09:26, 18 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Abies alba. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:07, 30 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Etymology edit

Abies means "fir tree" in Latin, plain and simple. I have no idea why anybody would say that it means "rising one"; but whatever the reason, it is utterly wrong. And albus means white, or (when contrasted with candidus), dull or matt white; certainly not "dead" white. On the contrary, the connotations of albus are always positive. The entire section on Etymology is a shame. Imerologul Valah (talk) 22:59, 20 September 2022 (UTC)Reply