Talk:AaAaAA!!! – A Reckless Disregard for Gravity

AaaaaAAaaaAAAaaAAAAaAAAAA!!! for the Awesome

I've noticed that AaaaaAAaaaAAAaaAAAAaAAAAA!!! for the Awesome is not mentioned anywhere on this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.17.174.21 (talk) 21:49, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Requested move 18 August 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. (non-admin closure) Omni Flames (talk) 07:09, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

---

AaAaAA!!! – A Reckless Disregard for Gravity → AaaaaAAaaaAAAaaAAAAaAAAAA!!! – A Reckless Disregard for Gravity – There is nothing wrong with articles having long titles, and the original title is the full title of the video game. – Pppery (talk) 02:19, 18 August 2016 (UTC) --Relisting. Omni Flames (talk) 07:00, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

After a move initiated by Salvidrim!, there were some additional moves that happened (two, three), so a one-week RM to gain consensus should be able to settle this. (permalink). — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 18:40, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

• Remain at AaAaAA!!! - Per the WP:CONCISE policy, all else being equal, avoiding unnecessarily lengthy titles is what we should do. Both titles meet our policy of precision, disambiguation and recognizability, but the longer one fails conciseness. The shorter form is also appropriately supported by references. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 22:39, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
• Oppose - No reason to have a lengthy title when the abbreviated one is more than sufficient. –Davey2010^Talk 19:07, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
• Oppose, and move to Aaa! A Reckless Disregard for Gravity, for the above reasons, and per MOS:TM, MOS:CAPS: We do not apply "wild and wacky" marketing stylizations to mimic the logos and covers of things. A quick search shows that reliable sources (e.g. gaming publications, etc.) do not at all treat this title consistency as to number of As, number of !s, capitalization, etc.. Thus, we should go with the minimal version that conveys the nature of the title, without trying parrot logo stylization that only exists to "GRAB ATTENTION WITH SCREAMING!!!". PS: The use of a dash in this construction is pointlessly redundant, and use of a hyphen here would be wrong per MOS:DASH, even if it weren't redundant.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼  20:50, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
• Oppose, like all-caps screeching. Where is your own boundary, Omni? Would you go along with an "original" title that is 500 255 characters long? Tony (talk) 01:22, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
  • @Tony1: Well, titles cannot be longer than 255 characters for technical reasons. Pppery (talk) 01:44, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on AaAaAA!!! – A Reckless Disregard for Gravity. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.avclub.com/articles/aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa%2C33372/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111216091719/http://www.indiegamechallenge.com/2010-finalists/aaaa-a-reckless-disregard-for-gravity/ to http://www.indiegamechallenge.com/2010-finalists/aaaa-a-reckless-disregard-for-gravity/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:40, 24 June 2017 (UTC)