Talk:A Song of Ice and Fire fandom

RfC: Is Westeros.org an expert SPS?

There is an RfC at Oathkeeper regarding whether the site Westeros.org meets the criteria for an expert self-published source (and is therefore suitable for use on Wikipedia). It is being cited as a source for the statement "This episode was based on [specific chapters of] [specific book]." Participation is welcome. Darkfrog24 (talk) 23:37, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Westeros section

The Westeros.org section reads as if it's attempting to boost the site and related individuals. Even if all of the facts are verifiable it should be written in a more neutral tone. (I don't watch this page or article space so if anyone wants my attention, please ping me.) --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 18:07, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

I reworked the section a bit and made sure every but of it is cited. Garcia is notable in this context, as the citations prove, and I do not think the current wording promotes him or the site unduly.— TAnthony^Talk 23:59, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on A Song of Ice and Fire fandom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.businessinsider.com/game-of-thrones-celebrity-fans-2016-4/?r=US&IR=T&IR=T%2F
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://featuresblogs.chicagotribune.com/entertainment_tv/2010/04/game-of-thrones-george-r-r-martin.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for https://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F10812F739550C718DDDAA0894DE404482
• Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/12/books/12crow.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2011/04/11/110411fa_fact_miller?currentPage=all
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721213804/http://grrm.livejournal.com/75053.html to http://grrm.livejournal.com/75053.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://shelf-life.ew.com/2011/07/12/george-martin-talks-a-dance-with-dragons/
• Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.theguardian.com/books/2010/feb/16/george-rr-martin-new-book
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://journal.neilgaiman.com/2009/05/entitlement-issues.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:36, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Removing content

I've pulled a lot out of this article, but it is seemingly a pile of links to primary sources, with very little summarizing what third parties have written/said about the fandom. A song of ice and fire should have been a trilogy (talk) 21:10, 14 August 2022 (UTC)