Talk:A Sign of the Times (Joe Pass album)

Jazz Low‑importance

	Jazz portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jazz, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of jazz on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JazzWikipedia:WikiProject JazzTemplate:WikiProject JazzJazz articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Requested move 23 October 2016

Latest comment: 7 years ago5 comments5 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. (non-admin closure) © Tbhotch^™ (en-2.5). 10:47, 1 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

A Sign of the Times (Joe Pass album) → A Sign of the Times – Nothing else called "A Sign of the Times". Unreal7 (talk) 22:00, 23 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Oppose we also have an article on A Sign of the Times (Petula Clark song) although it was issued with and without the "A". In ictu oculi (talk) 06:41, 24 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
Oppose The existence of the disambiguation page sign of the times makes it a likely search term for other possible targets with or without the indefinite article. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 20:15, 27 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
Oppose. The album isn't the primary topic of the name "A Sign of the Times" compared to the song (A) Sign of the Times, which the title track is a version of. [1] The current arrangement is probably for the best.--Cúchullain ^t/c 16:09, 31 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Add topic