Talk:A Perfect Vacuum

Untitled

I question whether a compilation of reviews of imaginary books can be categorized as a "novel." While this book is one of my favorites, it is simply not a novel. Muldrake (talk) 04:08, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

condensation

Ezra Pound introduces chapter 4 of his ABC of Reading with a quote: 'Great literature is simply language charged with meaning to the utmost possible degree'. He goes on to discuss the discovery, in a German-Italian dictionary, of the translation pair "Dichten=Condensare", i.e. 'to write poetry' (in German) is equated to 'to condense' (in Italian). Pound, of course, was focused on poetry, He did concede that prose was more efficient in some ways in modern literature, but he did not go into it. What I want to point out is that fictional reviews of imaginary books is a new form of condensation in prose. It is efficient, and especially good in conveying complex ideas to a non-specialist reader. I do not think that Lem is the first or only practitioner of this art, but he is a master. I am particularly fond of Non Serviam because, from my own background, I can appreciate just how well he performed his art in this case. --AJim (talk) 13:46, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on A Perfect Vacuum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110807183513/http://zajdel.fandom.art.pl/nominacje_200x.html to http://zajdel.fandom.art.pl/nominacje_200x.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:47, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on A Perfect Vacuum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060904185308/http://nupress.northwestern.edu/title.cfm?ISBN=0-8101-1733-9 to http://nupress.northwestern.edu/title.cfm?ISBN=0-8101-1733-9

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:14, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

"Opinions about "A Perfect Vacuum""?

Never seen such a section in Wikipedia. Is it appropriate? (I guess it's not that different from the common "critical reception" section...) GalPedy (talk) 08:05, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

You are right. Fixed. Staszek Lem (talk) 16:35, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Great, but the structure and content of the section itself is still pretty weird. The "Reception" sections I've seen were written as a paragraph and included more critical reviews. This sections seems like it could have been copied from the promotional text on the back cover of the book... GalPedy (talk) 10:25, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Now you are talking like a disgruntled customer. Sorry, Wikipedians are not Service desk. Also, we are not writing articles out of our head. In order to write a section, we have to find reliable sources which discuss the subject. If you know some, you are welcome to BE BOLD, that's all what I can say here now. Staszek Lem (talk) 20:26, 28 August 2019 (UTC)