Talk:A Gathering of Spirit

Indigenous peoples of North America Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Feminism

	Feminism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Untitled

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

both lesbian and heterosexual I think it's important to explicitly state "both lesbian and heterosexual" in the article, because, very commonly, lesbians are not recognized in anthologies "by women", and there is a general tendency to presume people are heterosexual unless they make a point of saying otherwise. I believe the contributions of lesbians to be significant to this anthology. Kootenayvolcano (talk) 00:12, 18 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Possible improvements

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

It would be good to add contemporary and subsequent discussion, particularly academic, of this volume and of individual works in it.Vizjim (talk) 08:08, 1 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic