Talk:ARM Guadaloupe
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Kindlydude in topic Is ARM Guadalupe considered Ironclad warship
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the ARM Guadaloupe article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
Feedback from New Page Review process edit
I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Overall, nice work on this article! Is it Guadaloupe or Guadalupe?.
Is ARM Guadalupe considered Ironclad warship edit
That ship fulfilled criteria of ironclad given by naval historian J. Richard Hill: simultanously having 1) a metal-skinned hull, 2) steam propulsion (paddle-wheel or screw propulsion) and 3) a main armament of guns capable of firing explosive shells (aka Paixhans gun). Kindlydude (talk) 08:20, 24 February 2023 (UTC)