Talk:ARCADE

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on ARCADE. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090331075138/http://www.3sat.de:80/nano/astuecke/129855/index.html to http://www.3sat.de/nano/astuecke/129855/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:26, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Space roar

'Space Roar' redirects to this page, but this page never uses the term. I suppose I'm meant to gather that ARCADE detected the signal, but nothing about it can be learned here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.206.169.55 (talk) 23:31, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Indeed, I noticed this too. References: [1] [2] [3]. —  Ark25  (talk) 15:47, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Oh good, I'm not the only person to come here looking for that. Either the article needs to be restored (and ideally updated), or the information needs to be restored here. I would prefer the former, but I'm not a deletionist who wants to eliminate as much content as possible (that's a big part of why I don't participate here anymore and haven't logged in for years). At least it's a redirect this time, so the last state of the standalone article remains accessible. -- 97.94.196.110 (talk) 02:59, 17 October 2017 (UTC)