Talk:ARA Almirante Brown (1880)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by DPdH in topic Citation needed in intro section

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:ARA Almirante Brown (1880)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Tomobe03 (talk · contribs) 22:47, 25 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

I'll review this article shortly.--Tomobe03 (talk) 22:47, 25 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • No disambiguation links (no action required)
  • No duplicate links (no action required)
  • Checklinks appears to be fine (no action required)
  • Image licensing and captions appear in order (no action required)
  • Sourcing checks out (no action required)

MOS/prose:

  • nine-inch steel-faced armor in the lead should have {{convert/spell }} template with adj=on parameter.
    • Did you mean to use the convert template in the lead? If so, that's been fixed.
  • In 650 t, tonnes should be spelled out. If there were a couple extra measurements in t nearby, abbreviated version would be fine.
    • Done.
  • Per MOS:CURRENCY full name of the currency should be used instead of ₤ symbol.
    • Where? As far as I can tell, it says that the pound symbol is what should be used to represent pound sterling.
      • Oops, I read the double vs single barred symbol (£ vs ₤). I still can't believe there are two symbols. Never mind that one.--Tomobe03 (talk) 16:42, 11 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nice article. No problems with the prose IMO, just a few MOS-related-nitpicking issues.--Tomobe03 (talk) 18:28, 10 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for reviewing the article, Tomobe. Let me know if there's anything else that needs doing. Parsecboy (talk) 15:02, 11 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Photo edit

Higher res version of the one in the article here. Parsecboy (talk) 20:57, 26 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Citation needed in intro section edit

Hi wikipedians, I've just tagged a sentence in the intro section asking for source citation; as in the article's body there is no information supporting that summary sentence. Regardless, I think is still a "good article" so no need to change this rating. Thank and regards, DPdH (talk) 07:59, 30 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

See the service history section, though "nearly two decades" is a bit of an overstatement. Parsecboy (talk) 12:04, 30 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for pointing to the supporting info about largest ship. Can't find the one related to use of steel though. Regards, DPdH (talk) 12:28, 30 July 2017 (UTC)Reply