Talk:AN/SPS-49

Comments

Wow, you really put up some great information in a hurry. I saw this morning that this article didn't exist, and by the afternoon the article was there. I knew it had to be you. After all, it is your area of expertise. I remember some very cold mornings on the USNS Stalwart, having to stand under the AN/SPS-49, watching the ET do his maintenance. That is about all I can contribute. --JAYMEDINC 00:42, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on AN/SPS-49. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060527212458/http://www.tpub.com:80/content/et/14089/css/14089_26.htm to http://www.tpub.com/content/et/14089/css/14089_26.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:39, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Variations

The section on variations could be improved in the article. For example, it reads a currency date of 2014, yet the former USS Long Beach is not so current. Another not-so-new example is the former Old Threat Upgrade (OTU) ships. Perhaps a wiki article might not even be the right place attempt to document these various configurations. Something else that might be helpful to the article, may be a statement about the variants that are allowed to be shared with or exported to nations foreign to the U.S. based defense contractor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.183.224.2 (talk) 23:36, 31 January 2017 (UTC)