| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the AGESA article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Unnamed section
editOkay, what does world+dog want to see on this topic, what is needed. I am a non-NDA Agesa reverse engineering expert Twobombs (talk) 10:08, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
nda or not, most components are considered trade secrets and thus not allowed on wikipedia but anything that is general knowledge is okay. Markthemac (talk) 02:14, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
- An insight into the bizarre numbering system would be useful. 83.104.249.240 (talk) 16:58, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- I just wrote a bit in an attempt to shed some light on that. It took me a while but I finally made some sense out of it. --uKER (talk) 02:36, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
Open source?
editseems to be open sourcecode in coreboot. Whats happened here? Would be good to expand. 188.220.243.64 (talk) 21:22, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
New version
editI read about the release of AMD Combo PI version 1.0.0.4 Patch B (SMU v46.54)[1]. Should this be added to the article. Because of this, I'm also confused by the version numbering. Because the version is now again a 1.0.0.4 version, while there were already 1.0.0.6 versions. Jan Vlug (talk) 12:56, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
- AMD always resets the version numbers for the different AGESA iterations, currently its Combo-PI and previous version was Pinnacle-PI. --Denniss (talk) 13:27, 26 December 2019 (UTC)