| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 9x18 Makarov redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Article Renaming
editAs per the general consensus from the team at Wikiproject: Military History, it would seem that this article really ought to be named "9x18 Makarov". I thought I'd give people a chance to comment before changing the title or moving the article, though. --Commander Zulu 08:57, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
- Yes I agree, but with the addition of the metric "mm" unit, no space naturally ;), so 9x18mm Makarov?. Koalorka (talk) 23:41, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Less Powerful?
editAccording to this and this 9 mm Luger Parabellum is more powerful, contrary to what article says. 217.26.163.26 10:15, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
Energy
editDoes anyone have energy info on this cartridge? C0N6R355 20:31, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
- I just did the math based on the given mass and velocity; it comes to 313 J. 140.183.63.33 13:16, 15 August 2007 (UTC)