 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled edit
The accuracy data linked to this missile system is unsupported by references, a bold statement that the weapon system is 80% accurate is unsupported. The source of this information should be provided, in order that readers can refer back to it and evaluate how the weapon system was evaluated, in particular what were the test parameters. Unless the accuracy data is evidenced I will delete it within 1 month. Use of RT as a source of information is questionable, RT is a media outlet, (setting aside it's relationship with the Russian government and therefore it's independence )reference to it could be used in the research phase where it could be used to point toward a primary source of information, provided that the journalist author cites their sources. Zakalwe101 (talk) 18:56, 29 May 2018 (UTC)