Talk:91st Division (United States)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Requested move edit

91st Training Division (Operations)91st Division (United States) — Name change is not keeping with WP:MILMOS#UNITNAME. Move was not discussed prior.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 23:56, 26 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

I moved it back to the stable title as requested. If anyone thinks the title should be changed, please propose it. (Bearing in mind that the article deals with the division's whole history, not just the present day, so its present-day name isn't necessarily the one that should be used for the article title.)--Kotniski (talk) 09:32, 6 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Patch edit

Didn't the division use a different (albeit similar) patch during World War II? I think it was basically just the pine tree. Be nice to see an image of it, too.172.190.235.31 (talk) 06:00, 13 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Notable members edit

I deleted the entry for Nader because he does not appear, based on his service, to meet notability guidelines.--Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 14:38, 24 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 91st Division (United States). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:27, 23 June 2017 (UTC)Reply