Talk:90210 season 4

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Former good article nominee90210 season 4 was a Media and drama good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 8, 2011Good article nomineeNot listed

Michael Ausiello spoilers edit

Michael Ausiello recently posted this:

  • Question: I was just wondering if you have anything new to share about 90210? —Kate
  • Ausiello: Would you believe me if I told you that a major character becomes a professional escort in Season 4?
  • Question: Any new scoop on 90210‘s fourth season? —Julius
  • Ausiello: Would you believe me if I told you that the major character that becomes a professional escort in Season 4 is Annie?


Some people add it, I disagree. I'm bringing it here because I'm not sure if it's true. His tone suggests he's joking or winding up. If anybody disagrees with me, I won't object to it being added back? Jayy008 (talk) 13:54, 29 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

I think it should be added and that it's true, first because it's unlikely of Ausiello to give false spoilers as a joke, and also because it was earlier announced that Annie would pursue an odd profession after Marla's family contest the will and she's left with no money. Here's the link to the spoiler - http://uk.eonline.com/news/watch_with_kristin/spoiler_chat_chuck_bass_attacked_by/256906?dlvrit=51396 Please, kindly consider this material and my opinion.( Dodomh95 (talk) 15:43, 29 August 2011 (UTC) ) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dodomh95 (talkcontribs) 15:39, 29 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Unlikely, but he usually doesn't say things like that. If you add it back to the plot section, I have no objection, I will simply fix it when you're done. Jayy008 (talk) 15:49, 29 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
If you do keep this, I'd suggest going with the Ausiello spoilers over the eonline link above. Kristin sort of has a reputation for being really freaky wrong in her spoilers. I don't know if her accuracy is still as bad as way back when the column was watch with Wanda (or Wrongda) but the rep has stuck and many readers likely won't find the information credible with that as a source. Millahnna (talk) 15:58, 29 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
I've never known Kristin herself to be unreliable. I do have to Ausiello source here: http://www.tvline.com/2011/08/ask-ausiello-spoilers-gossip-girl-glee-90210/ Jayy008 (talk) 16:17, 29 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
Maybe use both if the content is included? The entire time she was going by Wanda, she was known all over the interwebz as Wrongda. The running theory at Mighty Big TV (now Television Without Pity) was that she was trolling fan forums and stealing their most outlandish theories for her real doozies of wrong. But I haven't followed her column in years (she was outed as Kristin in what, the late 90s?) so it may be fine now. I still see the nickname thrown around a fair amount, so I thought it might be a good idea to mention that the reputation has apparently stuck and carried over. In this case, I'd think that Ausiello and Kristin would be a good tag team of sources; the actual text in their columns backs each other up nicely on this one. Both sources obviously meet our RS guidelines. I just wouldn't recommend using only her source since the reputation apparently still lingers. Terrible insomnia attack... am I making any sense? Millahnna (talk) 17:29, 29 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

You are, that makes sense. I will make the changes. Jayy008 (talk) 17:36, 29 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

I'll leave it to you Jayy008 to add the story-line to the plot. ( Dodomh95 (talk) 17:41, 29 August 2011 (UTC) )Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 90210 (season 4). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:57, 30 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on 90210 (season 4). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:13, 23 June 2017 (UTC)Reply