This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked
Coverage and accuracy: not checked
Structure: not checked
Grammar and style: not checked
Supporting materials: not checked
To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Latest comment: 11 months ago5 comments2 people in discussion
This IP [1], whose three prior contributions contained one about 777 Partners, is highly likely to have a conflict of interest. The IP is from Miami, sure a lot of people are, but the behaviour is highly suspicious. This edit [2] introduces a lot of promo language and for some reason removes 777's assets outside football, as well as the fact that their investment in Sevilla is a minority holding. This edit [3] is beyond suspicious, they did the trick of adding a reference while removing others. It is highly relevant that a businessman controlling multi-million assets around the world was outed by the Brazilian media as a convicted cocaine trafficker. Unknown Temptation (talk) 18:59, 23 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
We also have a user whose only previous edits were to say that 777 Partners had bought clubs, and has also removed this information and added promotional language, and just this morning an IP blanked the whole page to replace it with marketing drivel (something that Wikipedia's full-time edit reverters thought was OK). This page is a joke. Unknown Temptation (talk) 16:17, 13 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
I've added this back as every user who removed this was a single-purpose account who only ever edited things to do with 777. This cocaine conviction is relevant as it may even stop 777 owning Everton due to rules on fit and proper owners [4]Unknown Temptation (talk) 17:41, 12 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
I can't do that as I'm not an admin. It is on rare occasions that the 777 accounts remove the founder's drug conviction, so the WP:RFPP admins will say there's not enough disruption to warrant a protection, or will call it a "content dispute" despite the blatant connection the accounts have. Hopefully now 777 is in the UK news, there will be more users interested in English football who will be watching this page. Unknown Temptation (talk) 13:38, 15 September 2023 (UTC)Reply