Talk:705th Tank Destroyer Battalion

Merge proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

I propose that 75th_Cavalry_Regiment_(United_States) be merged into 705th Tank Destroyer Battalion. I think that the content in the 75th_Cavalry_Regiment_(United_States) article can easily be explained in the context of 705th Tank Destroyer Battalion, and the 705th Tank Destroyer Battalion article is of a reasonable size in which the merging of 75th_Cavalry_Regiment_(United_States) will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. Weatherman05071 (talk) 17:43, 2 February 2011 (UTC)\

Support The 75th Cavalry's lineage and history is the 705th Destroyer Battalion, I believe it should be noted that it was reorganized and serves a different mission than previous.Weatherman05071 (talk) 17:52, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

• Support- 705 should be redirected to the most modern version. as that seems to be standard way to go. Brian in denver (talk) 02:12, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
• Oppose. I don't think this would be helpful; whilst the two units share a nominal lineage, it's not really the case that they're the same unit. The 705th TD was disbanded in 1945, and the 75th Cavalry did not come into existence for sixty years after that, to fulfil a different role under a different name; the link between them is, to all intents and purposes, ceremonial only, and assigned arbitrarily by a historically-minded planner. I don't think there's any real benefit to merging - whilst this is done in some cases, it usually implies a lot more historical and conceptual connection than is the case here. Shimgray | talk | 12:46, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

• Oppose. I was IN the 75th Cavalry's 1st Squadron (and only squadron to date) at the time of its activation in 2004, and I was the one tasked to get in touch with their association to let them know we'd been activated. But the 75th Cav crests were not commercially available at the time, the guys voted on it and decided it looked "like an exploding pile of dog shit", so we attempted to submit a redesign to DA's Institute of Military Heraldry. The squadron colors were a unit design, not the 705th's approved pattern, and so on. Basically the connection is one display case at the front of Squadron HQ, Building 4021, Fort Campbell in 3/502 Infantry's old space, plus a couple questions at the Soldier of the Month or promotion boards. My 2 cents.WiseguyThreeOne (talk) 08:12, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

• Oppose. I can't say it better than the last two users who opposed this, except to add my voice and vote. I came into 1-75 shortly before the changeover. There is no real link between the 705th and 1-75.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://homepage.mac.com/yeide/TDBattalionHistories.htm
  • In 106th Cavalry Regiment (United States) on 2011-05-23 02:02:10, 404 Not Found
  • In 106th Cavalry Regiment (United States) on 2011-05-31 22:04:55, 404 Not Found
  • In 705th Tank Destroyer Battalion on 2011-06-19 21:01:10, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 21:02, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 705th Tank Destroyer Battalion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100103080616/http://homepage.mac.com/yeide/TDBattalionHistories.htm to http://homepage.mac.com/yeide/TDBattalionHistories.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool. --Lineagegeek (talk) 23:18, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:34, 30 September 2016 (UTC)