Talk:702nd Tactical Air Support Squadron
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Lineagegeek in topic Completely wrong history - Here is the correct history.
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 702nd Tactical Air Support Squadron article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Completely wrong history - Here is the correct history. edit
See the link: http://www.afhra.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet_print.asp?fsID=14001 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 214.28.226.254 (talk) 17:45, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
- Not sure what you might be talking about. Link is dead and not saved on Wayback Machine. Since neither the 402d or the 702d has been active during the time AFHRA has been posting factsheets on the web, it seems unlikely the referenced page relates to either unit.Lineagegeek (talk) 22:05, 15 January 2023 (UTC)