Talk:70/20/10 model (learning and development)

Untitled

Markup broken. This page is unreadable as it stands. Liam Proven (talk) 13:14, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

I would like to know which company had use this model, beside google and dell — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.193.53.1 (talk • contribs)

Allen Tough

Professor Tough's research, while also apparently using the number 70, has little to do with this specific model and the idea that 70% of learning comes from tough jobs. Self directed learning could fall under any of the three categories presented. 104.183.198.36 (talk) 13:45, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Salient Criticism

I think this article needs a look at the relevant criticisms levied at the "70-20-10" hypothesis in order to make the article more neutral and scientifically sound. 104.183.198.36 (talk) 15:30, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Factual?

i would like to know if there is any substance to this model. do companies actually track the time for each project and make sure it's the right 70/20/10 distribution? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.241.226.11 (talk • contribs)

This might help answer your question. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.116.254.200 (talk) 06:19, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

It does look as if it is an idea with no coherent evidence. The article should be marked for deletion. Fustbariclation (talk) 00:27, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

This model is based on a significant body of academic research that shows the majority of learning is experiential (the '70') and social (the '20'). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jchjennings (talk • contribs) 00:43, 17 August 2015‎ (UTC)

It is very much measurable - please see: https://www.702010forum.com/Posts/view/measuring-the-impact-of-70-20-10 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.151.229.28 (talk) 06:11, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Major sections of this read like marketing material for the 70 20 10 forum. I would like to see more citations and the removal of the "Strategy" section. 104.183.198.36 (talk) 21:12, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

70:20:10 is an L&D reference model that is used by a large number of organisations across the world. Although the exact ratios of experience:exposure: education vary dependent on context of each organisation there is a body of research that underpins it. See: 70% (Tough, 1971, 1979); 70% (Bruce, Aring, and Brand, 1998); 62% (Zemke, 1985 and Verespej, 1998); 70% (Vader, 1998); 85-90% (Raybold, 2000); 70% (Dobbs, 2000); 75% (Lloyd, 2000) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jchjennings (talk • contribs) 00:33, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Let's keep this section related to the business version of 70:20:10. Start a new section if you'd like to continue defending the LD model. 104.183.198.36 (talk) 16:36, 20 August 2015 (UTC)