| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 7.62×45mm article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dimensional Discrepancy edit
I tried to clean up the dimensional issue as best I could. I took the Howell book as best source, definitely more authoritative than Cartridge Corner, which while it lists sources at the end doesn't say what data came from which source. And I tried to list the conflicting info better in a subsection of the article. I may add a table instead of the current format, which is still confusing. Arthurrh 02:18, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
I did small update. Note ballistic performance data are from Cermak & Popelinsky (both sources the same data). About production date - probably not before 1952, and not after 1957, but I'm not sure if only 1952. hrd 2007-08-16
Additional Deminsional Discrepancey edit
This, like the AK47 round 7.62x39, uses .310 or .311 caliber bullets. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rrw-racing (talk • contribs) 22:11, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
7.92×33mm Kurz edit
I can't understand what relationship the 7.92×33mm Kurz round has with this article. If there's no reason to include it in the "See Also" section I'll remove it next time I come through here (unless someone beats me to it.) 67.150.62.155 (talk) 00:45, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
- Done 4.156.81.150 (talk) 17:24, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
Intermediate? edit
Is there a source if this is an Intermediate cartridge? FSbiran (talk) 08:00, 11 February 2024 (UTC)