Talk:647 Fifth Avenue/GA1

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Epicgenius in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 23:31, 1 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:31, 1 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Comments

edit
  • Move "Use mdy dates" below the hatnote.
  • Add alt text to every image being used.
  • "aboveground" should be two words.
  • "in a manner similar to" - kinda wordy
  • "on the site to designs" - reword
  • Add a serial comma after "a new mezzanine".
  • "through second story" → "through the second story"
  • "the plan an" → "the plan as an"
  • Wikilink The New York Times and Alex Kuczynski.

Progress

edit
GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·  
@Some Dude From North Carolina: Thanks. I've fixed all of these. Epicgenius (talk) 19:01, 9 July 2021 (UTC)Reply