Talk:60 Wall Street/GA1

GA Review edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Shushugah (talk · contribs) 17:03, 2 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Easily passes GA status edit

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )

3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

I finished reading the article carefully. The prose is extremely on point. It's grammatically correct, flows nicely and written in neutral form. I made a quick edit to fix some small typos/missing spaces and renamed one section, but otherwise it conforms with MOS:LAYOUT, quality and secondary references, no original research, it's broad without being too broad.

Congratulations on the Good Article status! ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 17:03, 2 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic