Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 12:06, 3 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Created by Sahaib (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 31 past nominations.

Sahaib (talk) 12:59, 30 July 2024 (UTC).Reply

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited:  
  • Interesting:  
QPQ: Done.

Overall:   Everything is okay, just needs waiting for the deletion discussion. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 12:50, 24 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

@TheNuggeteer: it is done. Sahaib (talk) 19:53, 29 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Good. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 13:53, 30 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Possible GA

edit

Hello, I have looked at the article and it is not bad at all, it contains good information, references and covers the entire topic, I think that like "$456,000 Squid Game in Real Life!" This article can be GA without problems. So I'm telling user @Sahaib: (who has had two GAs) to see what he thinks of the idea. 2801:1CA:E:1411:E439:9F79:E143:3830 (talk) 21:49, 31 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

@2801:1CA:E:1411:E439:9F79:E143:3830 I'm not Sahaib, but I agree, will check problems later. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 23:41, 24 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
@TheNuggeteer: It's an excellent idea for you to write the article, because I think it has the potential to be a GA. However, you would have to check if the article is well written and find a little more information: this and these sources can help you to add. Without further ado, I wish you luck with the article. 2801:1CA:E:1411:7571:318:9173:BD64 (talk) 20:26, 5 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Merge

edit

Should be merged into Mrbeast 2605:8D80:420:39C1:7D8C:C44F:33C9:8042 (talk) 13:49, 14 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Should the fact that this was sponsored by Samsung be in the lead section?

edit

WP:LEAD says: It should identify the topic, establish context, explain why the topic is notable, and summarize the most important points, including any prominent controversies.

The sponsorship is not controversial afaik and it is not one of the most important points to know about the video. So I removed it from the lead section (it is still mentioned further down of course). Polygnotus (talk) 20:35, 14 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Polygnotus: I based it off $456,000 Squid Game in Real Life! in which the sponsor of that video is mentioned in the lead. Without the sponsor the video would arguably not have been made and they play a prominent role in one of the challenges as mentioned in the article. I'm fine with it not being in the lead. Sahaib (talk) 20:55, 14 September 2024 (UTC)Reply