Talk:5.1 surround sound

5.1 ( 6-channel sound )

I'm thinking about making this an article; any thoughts; yes. no? I dislike the surround sound article. Daniel Christensen (talk) 00:37, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved per discussion below. GTBacchus^(talk) 05:32, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

---

5.1 → 5.1 surround sound

See discussion at Talk:8 channel audio#Requested move.

5.1 and 7.1 are both esoteric titles that mean little to those unfamiliar with the subject, and large numbers of English speakers would be in this category. The longer, more descriptive titles are also in common use, unambiguous, and should be preferred. Andrewa (talk) 17:54, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

• Support as nominator, see reasons above. Andrewa (talk) 17:54, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
• Support for same reasons as above. --Sujayt 17:01, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
• Support per nom. No-brainer. I don't think this is a controversial move, so I think you could be bold and move this page, 8 channel audio, 10.2, and 22.2 without proposing the moves on the talk page first. Also, since the target articles don't exist yet, you don't need admin intervention to make the move. SnottyWong talk 22:23, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Correction: 7.1 surround sound does exist, so a proper move for 8 channel audio would require admin intervention. SnottyWong talk 22:28, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Discussion

Although I haven't nominated them a this stage, if this move goes ahead I'll of course be proposing similar moves for 10.2 and 22.2. Andrewa (talk) 18:02, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

hi — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.139.97.79 (talk) 17:21, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Apparent inconsistency

The main Surround sound article says, in its History section:

5.1 surround sound originated in 1987 at the famous French Cabaret Moulin Rouge.

This is inconsistent with this article's claim that it dates back to 1976. Citations needed to resolve I guess.

low freq

the article says the ".1" is "low frequency" but it would nice to know how low, e.g. related to the other 5 channels. 212.29.231.179 (talk) 09:17, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Dolby Digital standard says 120 Hz. http://atsc.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/A52-201212-17.pdf --Kjoonlee 04:55, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

SACD?

Glorious surround sound is one of the primary attributes of SACDs, yet they don't seem to be mentioned anywhere on this page.

Thousands are available globally, and the site sa-cd.net consistently tracks and reivews what becomes available, month after month. Thanks for listening -- ResearcherQ (talk) 14:48, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Subwoofer position?

The article contains 2 diagrams that show the positions of the 5 full-bandwidth speakers but no clear mention of the location of the low-frequency/".1"/subwoofer. I believe it's position is considered less important/precise than the others, but someone who knows more should probably add some information about it. Eight40 (talk) 16:45, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Encoded in two channels?

I have a Harmon/Kardon AVI 200II amplifier that has outputs for 5.1 but its inputs are all stereo. Is it possible to record the information for 5.1 in just two channels? If so, would someone please include that information in the article. If not, please explain how the 5.1 information is transmitted from a DVD or Blu-ray player to an amplifier. John Link (talk) 17:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Is Surround_sound#Creating surround sound related to this section? 147.161.13.141 (talk) 20:43, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on 5.1 surround sound. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

• Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.apg.tm.fr/recherche-developpement-apg-france.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:36, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

5.1-EX

The meaning of 5.1-EX should be explained. --Mlang.Finn (talk) 16:26, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

THX is a system?

THX is not a system or a format, it's a certification/quality assurance system for existing systems (such Dolby Digital and DTS). 92.11.193.175 (talk) 15:01, 30 September 2023 (UTC)