Talk:4th Machine Gun Battalion (Australia)

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 4th Machine Gun Battalion (Australia) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: South Pacific / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force
	World War I task force

Australia: Military history Low‑importance

	Australia portal 4th Machine Gun Battalion (Australia) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Comments edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

In the History section, the statement about disbanding in 1919 is duplicated and supported by different sources. Seems to me that one should be chosen.' In the Legacy section, first sentence, "the concept" should be defined (presume it refers to organizing machine guns into separate units, or just into battalions). --Lineagegeek (talk) 16:17, 10 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

@Lineagegeek: Thanks for spotting these, I think I've corrected them now. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 12:58, 11 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic