Talk:4: The Remix/GA1

Latest comment: 11 years ago by My love is love in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tomica (talk · contribs) 21:18, 24 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation links and dead references
  • End of Time redirects to The End of Time and Switch (DJ) to DJ Switch (however for the last I guess he is the same). — Tomica (talk) 17:15, 25 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • No dead links. That's good. — Tomica (talk) 17:15, 25 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
Infobox
  • Are you sure that all the songs were recorded in the period 2011-12? The 4 article says recording took place from 2009-2011? — Tomica (talk) 17:15, 25 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • Why don't you add the producers in the infobox, instead of saying various? — Tomica (talk) 17:15, 25 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
Lead
  • Prior to the release of the album ---> Is a extended play really an album? — Tomica (talk) 17:15, 25 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • Rest is fine.— Tomica (talk) 17:15, 25 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
Background and development
  • The contest, which was opened to entrants in 25 countries ---> Maybe you can name some of the countries? — Tomica (talk) 17:15, 25 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • Also with naming some countries, you can split the big sentence in 2 sentences? — Tomica (talk) 17:15, 25 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • Maybe you can tell from which country was the winner? — Tomica (talk) 17:15, 25 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
Release and production
  • "The beat is great and I feel this mix would definitely get people moving in a club. It's got just enough attitude to get Beyonce fans moving." ---> I really think you can paraprase this ;) ! — Tomica (talk) 17:15, 25 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • the EP appeared ---> The EP debuted. — Tomica (talk) 17:15, 25 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
Track listing
  • Why don't you use this format? In that way you can also show which is the original producer. — Tomica (talk) 21:26, 27 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
Credits and personnel
Charts
Release history
  • No issues. 21:26, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
References

All in all, a very good written article. You can start resolving the issues now. — Tomica (talk) 21:26, 27 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Everything   Done. My love is love (talk) 09:42, 28 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
All in all
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: