Talk:46 BC
Latest comment: 17 days ago by 2603:8001:C00:9485:551:B912:A496:8F22 in topic Untitled
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Untitled
editis there a reason for: Julian calendar 46 BC | XLV BC considering XLV is 45, not 46?
- That is a thing to ponder. The year 1BC is given the roman numeral N. So esseintialy a year zero is shoehorned on a numbering system that doesn't have a zero and lacking in the one that does have.--Nngnna (talk) 09:12, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
Sonby 2603:8001:C00:9485:551:B912:A496:8F22 (talk) 09:40, 30 July 2024 (UTC)