![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is currently the subject of an educational assignment. |
Group #4 Doing the Review
editReview #1 Katie McEvoy I really like that you added applications of the chemical to your article. I know it can be difficult finding the research to support this information, but it really adds to the quality of the article. For the synthesis, I suggest showing the mechanism. Showing the step by step reactions would help readers better understand how the chemical is formed in lab. I would also suggest showing the mechanisms for the reactions that the chemical is involved in. This helps readers understand the properties of the chemical. Other than that all of your information looks solid. Good job! Mcevoykt (talk) 02:52, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
Review #2 Cathleen Cahill I like how this article includes safety column. It was interesting to read. Also, your chem box is very extensive and informative. I would suggest expanding on the oxidation and reduction sections by going step by step. Your reference list is very extensive. This article is well organized. Cmcahil2 (talk)06:01, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
Review #3 Matt Kleinjan This article has a lot of good information. The chembox is very detailed and contains a lot of good safety information. It looks like there are some words missing in the introduction so make sure you complete that. Also, some of your references seem to be duplicated so make sure your references only show up once. Otherwise all of your other sections seem well done and nicely detailed. Both your safety and applications section have a lot of useful information.