{Title}piyush{/title}

Inverse Photo Lithography

edit

Inverse Photo Lithography might provide another step beyond a 2 nm node. Design 2 Silicon: https://design2silicon.com/ They claim to combine GPU acceleration with a unique stitchless approach to enable full-chip, curvilinear Inverse lithography technology (ILT) in a day. Explanation of Inverse lithography technology (ILT) from their website: https://design2silicon.com/products/truemask-ilt/ "Inverse lithography technology (ILT) creates ideal lithography results through a mathematically rigorous inverse approach that determines the mask shapes that will produce the desired on-wafer results. The semiconductor industry has long recognized the value of curvilinear ILT for improving process windows for advanced nodes. However, until now, weeks-long runtimes have held curvilinear ILT back from use as a full-chip solution."

Custom Computer Makes Inverse Lithography Technology Practical for First Time D2S has built a GPU-based supercomputer that cracks the last problem in speeding up optical lithography https://spectrum.ieee.org/nanoclast/semiconductors/materials/custom-computer-makes-inverse-lithography-practical-for-first-time — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:A03F:5C24:8F00:E13B:26C1:24E2:C3E6 (talk) 14:32, 2 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

"Intel 3" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Intel 3. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 20#Intel 3 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Mdewman6 (talk) 22:45, 20 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Intel and Synopsys Expand Partnership to Enable Leading IP on Intel Advanced Process Nodes

edit

Intel is expanding the partnership of 3 nm process as indicated at Intel and Synopsys Expand Partnership to Enable Leading IP on Intel Advanced Process Nodes. Rjluna2 (talk) 16:20, 15 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Apple A17 doesn't use TSMC N3, it uses TSMC N3B

edit

according to its wikipedia page and sources inside it Considerin-editin-seriously (talk) 19:16, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Considerin-editin-seriously, another Wikipedia article is not a reliable source, per WP:CIRCULAR, but the references used in that article may be reliable. Edit accordingly. Cullen328 (talk) 19:28, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply