This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles
Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
While I agree it makes sense to include the criticism that has been voiced against the updated election system, but there is way to much detail here, it reads more like a short newspaper article on the topic rather than what is notable for Wikipedia. I think the criticism should be summarised in a couple of sentences, rather than adding these detailed quotes and opinions of (not that notable) individuals. 92.40.212.155 (talk) 15:19, 27 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
