Talk:2024 Noto earthquake

Semi-protected edit request on 3 January 2024

Change "The earthquake was also felt by residents in Tokyo and across the Kanto Region[5] and as far as Aomori Prefecture in the northern tip of Kyushu to Honshu in the south of the country."

to "The earthquake was also felt by residents in Tokyo and across the Kanto Region[5] and as far as Aomori Prefecture in the northern tip of Honshu to Kyushu in the south of the country.", as Aomori is located on the northern tip of Honshu and not on Kyushu, whilst Kyushu is in the southwest of the country. 49.228.240.242 (talk) 08:22, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Done. Probably a typo. Borgenland (talk) 08:26, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Wht the summary? 143.44.165.91 (talk) 11:28, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

2023 ishikawa event is a foreshock?

is the 2023 ishikawa m 6.3 event the foreshock? theres a high possibility... Scrub Mommy (talk) 14:02, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

How could it be a foreshock when it occurred 9 minutes after the 7.5??? Borgenland (talk) 14:04, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

They're talking about this one. Sadustu Tau (talk) 15:50, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Apologies. My eye probably got strained. Borgenland (talk) 15:53, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

We need reliable consenus from scientists to present their views about the preceeding 6.3. There are a few examples of foreshocks happening years before the mainshock, one includes the 2002 Sumatra earthquake which is a foreshock to the 9.2 in 2004. Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 01:00, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Actually a foreshock of 5.7 did happen a few minutes or so before at 16:06 with the major one happening at 16:10. The 16:06 was definitely noticeable in Kanazawa. (Note there can be discrepancies in time on the JMA site between 'observed time' and 'issued time'. The former being the actual time.) Macgroover (talk) 06:56, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

See Noto earthquake swarm 93.103.223.236 (talk) 02:30, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Damage to Kanazawa and Uchinada

There was major damage to the Uchinada area because of liquefaction.

Also, a landside destroyed four houses in the ShinTagami area of Kanazawa. Macgroover (talk) 06:59, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Maximum tsunami run-up height

A run-up height of 6.58 m has been mentioned. This source explains the origin of the report. The general page on the tsunami reports this value as provisional. Mikenorton (talk) 19:18, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Merge

I suggest that Noto earthquake swarm be merged into this article. Because Noto earthquake swarm is very substub. The largest of the series of earthquake swarms will be the 2024 earthquake, so I think it would be a good idea to also explain the earthquake swarm that has been occurring for several years in this article. 124.35.54.170 (talk) 07:32, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

• Support on condition — Nothing remotely notable about the swarm I think the table shouldn't appear if there's not going to be a proper paragraph to detail the swarm. The Japanese article elaborates further on it though.Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 09:14, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

• Support for now - I think that the swarm may well be notable, there's quite a lot of papers written about it. Merge for now but article could be recreated in the future based on what's been published. Mikenorton (talk) 10:17, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

• Support - There's not much on the swarm article. It should be merged. Quake1234 (talk) 15:34, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

 Done I merged it. 124.35.54.170 (talk) 07:30, 26 February 2024 (UTC)