Talk:2019 Paul Hunter Classic/GA1

Latest comment: 4 years ago by HawkAussie in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: HawkAussie (talk · contribs) 00:37, 23 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

I will be happy to review this article and see if their are things that need be improved apron. HawkAussie (talk) 00:37, 23 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for taking a look at this one HawkAussie! I'm back from my honeymoon now, so will be more than happy to make any changes that the article requires. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 18:25, 25 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
Hi HawkAussie - I know you are probably busy, but I just wanted to know if this one might be looked at in the next few days? Not a problem if it will take longer. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 13:46, 30 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Lead edit

  • 2019 edition of the Paul Hunter Classic first held in 2004 as the Grand Prix Fürth. - I'm not really a person who likes to see red links in the lead but I assume you will get to that page soon enough.
    • Me neither, but it's a notable event, and it's surprising it doesn't have an article. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 08:42, 31 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
  • The event featured a 16-player bracket with a qualification tournament. - Maybe expand along the lines of how many entered the qualification tournament or when the qualification was held
  • You could the highest break down into the second paragraph of the lead instead of it being on the first.

Tournament format edit

  • The Paul Hunter Classic was named after deceased snooker professional, Paul Hunter. - A slight expansion to include when he did die as you have it in the lead but not in the main body.
  • Qualifying for the event featured 36 participants. - You could in some way merge this with the previous sentence.
  • ...were invited to play, but pulled out of the event. - Remove the comma here.
  • All matches held in the event were played as best-of-7-frames. - This is probably placed in the wrong section of the paragraph 2 as I would think that it should be at the end.

Tournament summary edit

  • Iulian Boiko won the qualifying event, defeating Barry Pinches 3–2 in the final. - Just a thought that you had already mentioned that earlier in the article.
  • All matches finished 4–0. - That sentence just feels too short to have on it's own.
  • ...over Ricky Walden, and Mark King... - Remove the comma
  • Isn't the section for the semi-finals a bit light for info considering the two semis, but than again this is a non-ranking event.
    • Not much I can do. The event wasn't even broadcast outside of facebook. The sources don't say much. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 08:50, 31 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
  • China Championship, and lose - Comma removal

References edit

No problem with the references here.

Final comments edit

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.