Talk:2018 Paris ePrix

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Courcelles in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:2018 Paris ePrix/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Courcelles (talk · contribs) 16:49, 28 July 2018 (UTC)Reply



  • " unsuccessfully tried to overtake him. " Needs another word.
  • "clinch his third victory of the season." There's a lot of names before this his, and they're all male.
  • "Construction of the circuit took around six days with workers using 5,000 t (11,000,000 lb) of material shipped to the Port" As a statistic, the GA criteria require a direct citation. Also, why are we using pounds and not, as the French would, kilograms?
  • "starting order was determined " -> "starting order for the ePrix was determined"
  • "first group's top five drivers." Given each group only had five drivers, this is a "duh" thing to explicitly say.
  • "which meant everyone had to use 4% for the rest of the ePrix" If they had 40%, why could they only use 4%?
  • Other than Abt, who were the other two drivers with FanBoost?
  • "I wanted to win this year it was clearly Paris" is missing the closing quotation marks

Everything else looks fine. Courcelles (talk) 17:19, 28 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

@Courcelles: All of the above suggestions have been implemented. The winners of the FanBoost can be found in the first paragraph of the race sub-section. MWright96 (talk) 18:15, 28 July 2018 (UTC)Reply
Missed that, sorry. Promoted. Courcelles (talk) 18:43, 28 July 2018 (UTC)Reply