Talk:2017 Buenos Aires ePrix
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Bcschneider53 in topic GA Review
![]() | 2017 Buenos Aires ePrix has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
![]() | 2017 Buenos Aires ePrix is part of the 2016-17 Formula E season race reports series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2017 Buenos Aires ePrix article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:2017 Buenos Aires ePrix/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Bcschneider53 (talk · contribs) 04:19, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
I'll take another Formula E article to try to trim down this Sports and Recreation backlog. Hope to have comments up within 24 hours. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 04:19, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
No dab/external link issues.
Lead
edit- "the ninth of his career, and became the first driver" -> and he became the first driver
Background
edit- "Before the race e.Dams-Renault driver Sébastien Buemi" any reason not to link Buemi?
- One of the many mistakes editors make when they write quickly. Now linked. MWright96 (talk) 12:46, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
- "his team's objective was to secure victory in Buenos Aires, accumulate as many possible points" I'd rewrite this to "his team's objective was to secure victory in Buenos Aires and accumulate as many possible points"
Practice and qualifying
edit- "In the fourth (and final) group" I think just "In the final group" works fine.
- "Despite going slower than Turvey in the track's first sector, Di Grassi" should this be a lowercase d as it isn't the start of a sentence?
- That's correct. MWright96 (talk) 12:46, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
- "but heavily locked his tyres which meant he qualified in second place." This almost makes me think locking tyres is worth a one-place grid penalty. Perhaps something like "but heavily locked his tyres, eventually qualifying in second place." would work better?
Race
edit- "The three drivers, who were allowed to use the boost, were determined by a fan vote." I don't think the commas are necessary here, though American and British English are different so don't worry if I'm mistaken.
- "a 90 percent of change of rain was forecast before the event" Should this be "a 90 percent chance of rain"?
- "while Vergne set the fastest lap of the race so far" "so far" makes this sound more like live commentary. Perhaps "while Vergne set what was at that point the fastest lap of the race"?
- Reworded MWright96 (talk) 12:46, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
- "Evans was issued with a five-second time penalty" I don't think "with" is necessary here.
- "while Rosenqvist set the race's fastest lap (and overall track record) at one minute and 9.467 seconds" should this be noted as a "race" track record since they went faster in qualifying?
- Clarified MWright96 (talk) 12:46, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
Post-race
edit- "His team was concerned over his battery overheating which Buemi stated" -> "His team was concerned over his battery overheating; Buemi stated"
No issues in the Classification sections or references that I could spot. On hold for the standard seven days. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 23:11, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
- @Bcschneider53: Thank you for another review. All of the above issues have been dealt with. MWright96 (talk) 12:46, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
- @MWright96: Not a problem. Great job. Pass for GA. You may well have a Good or Featured Topic on your hands if you keep this up. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 15:52, 12 June 2017 (UTC)