Talk:2017–2018 Department of Justice metadata seizures/GA1
Latest comment: 2 years ago by GhostRiver in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: GhostRiver (talk · contribs) 19:16, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
I'll be taking a look at this! — GhostRiver 19:16, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
Lede
editBackground
editthere were 27 open investigations into what he called an "epidemic" of leaks of classified information, about nine times what the Obama administration had undertaken.
Copied from source
Metadata seizure
editCNN
editProsecutors were seeking email records from a time period when Starr reported on US military options in North Korea that were ready to be presented to Trump, as well as stories on Syria and Afghanistan.
Copied from sourceCNN General Counsel David Vigilante was prohibited under a gag order issued by a federal magistrate judge in the Eastern District of Virginia from sharing any details about the government's efforts with anyone beyond the network's president, top attorneys at CNN's corporate parent and attorneys at an outside law firm.
Copied from source
New York Times
editWashington Post
edit- Most of this paragraph is close to or copied from the source and needs to be reworded per WP:LIMITED
Other news media
editLawmakers
editWhile Apple says it would have normally informed customers
copied from sourcerecords seized included those from staff members who had nothing to do with issues related to Russia or former FBI Director James Comey,
Copied from source
Don McGahn
editAftermath
editInvestigations
editLegality
editReactions
editOrganizations
editA Google spokeswoman said that while it does not comment on specific cases, the company was "firmly committed to protecting our customers’ data and we have a long history of pushing to notify our customers about any legal requests."
copied from source
Trump administration
editpush to unmask leakers of classified information
very specific phrase copied from source
Biden administration
edit- Almost all of the last paragraph is copied from the source
Congress
editReferences
edit- Reference [65] is a bare link that needs to be filled in full
- Access date needed for [11] (Benner), [29] (Savage and Goldman), [88] (Schiff)
- Missing work on [38] and [66]
General comments
edit- Photos are properly licensed and relevant
- No stability concerns in the revision history
- Concerns about Earwig score noted above. Most is from quoting, some needs to be fixed
The number of copyright violations here (I have not even checked all of the matches), plus the fact that you have already received warnings for copyright violations, gives me significant pause in this review. I am marking this as a fail. — GhostRiver 22:22, 15 November 2021 (UTC)