Deaths edit

  • The deaths section is getting out of hand. There are too many entries. Discuss a criteria for notability to trim the section.
  • Please use only reliable sources like prominent newspaper sites. Check dates of death before adding. I found several mistakes. The date of news article is not always date of death.
  • Use a single format for entries and citations.

-Kenfyre (talk) 16:32, 7 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

  • I totally agree with Kenfyre, no. of death reports gone well beyond the scope of the 2015 in India page. India is a country with 1.2 billion populations and therefore no. of deaths of prominent personalities are also very high. I suggest we should put a cap of (let's say) 5 per month in such reports. In that case also it will be around 60 in the whole year the no. is still high. Now I have full faith on the Wikipedia editors that they will priorities the entries and edit the section (specially in January 2015) accordingly. And one more thing I'd like to see more input on the other important events also.

-User:M.soumen (talk) 24 February 2015

There are still fewer entries than in "2015 in the United Kingdom" and other smaller countries. I have used similar notability guidelines and format as "Deaths in 2015" e.g. A typical entry reports information in the following sequence: Name, age, reason for notability, established cause of death (if known) and reference. --Racklever (talk) 09:56, 24 February 2015 (UTC)Reply
@Racklever: Deaths in 2015 has only one guideline that the person should have a Wikipedia page, and it has no other notability criteria. -Kenfyre (talk) 08:34, 3 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
I think we should remove deaths that were covered only by regional papers and not by national papers. Those entries belong in regional articles like 2015 in Delhi. What do you say, @M.soumen:? -Kenfyre (talk) 08:30, 3 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi Kenfyre, I also agree with you, there are too many entries in the Death category. It should be rationalized. Do what you believe best. Then it can always be reviewed if necessary. Regards M.soumen

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on 2015 in India. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:13, 21 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:06, 6 June 2022 (UTC)Reply