Talk:2015 Vuelta a España/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 08:47, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Glad to review this. Zwerg Nase (talk) 08:47, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

An exquisitly written article on this year's Vuelta. I made several minor changes myself which leaves only minor things to do:

• The the last paragraph of the lead, I feel the wording should be slightly changed. At the moment it sounds like Valverde won the classification on the last stage alone. Maybe better: was decided during?
• Pre-race favorites: last paragraphs: I feel it is quite the generalized statement to assume that all sprinters were preparing for the WC.
• Caption for the stage 11 photo: It might have been the most difficult stage, but that is not an objective statement.
• Any chance for a source on the mountain points?

That's about it. Great work! I put it on hold for now. Zwerg Nase (talk) 19:58, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, Zwerg Nase. How does that look? Relentlessly (talk) 20:51, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Excellent! Another one off the list :) Congrats! Zwerg Nase (talk) 22:27, 3 October 2015 (UTC)