2015 Country Liberal Party leadership spill is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The last edit introduced a badly-worded but important sentence in "The challengers only had nine supporters, lacking the 13 required install a new chief minister". This is a bit misleading in that, without further context, it implies that they didn't have the numbers within the party, rather than within the parliament, which is what they lacked. This is all the more important considering the unusual circumstances of this challenge - I cannot think of any recent historical precedent where a leader has lost the support of a majority of his own caucus but remained because the minority of caucus wouldn't vote for the challenger as Chief Minister or Premier. As such, without clarification I think most people are going to assume they just didn't have the numbers within their own party, and I think we need a better wording... The Drover's Wife (talk) 01:54, 5 February 2015 (UTC)Reply
I've tweaked this a bit - it's a confusing situation! Nick-D (talk) 10:06, 5 February 2015 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=logo}
