Talk:2014 Washington, D.C., Initiative 71

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Initiative 71. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot*this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive {newarchive} to https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/dc-legalizes-pot-in-capital-despite-threats-from-congress/2015/02/26/60b133a6-bdac-11e4-9dfb-03366e719af8_story.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:11, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Rename to Cannabis in Washington, D. C., split off, or what?

Right now almost every single US state and territory has a "Cannabis in X" article for itself, but DC is using this page, Initiative 71, as its main article.

Should we re-name this page to Cannabis in Washington, D.C. and then flesh it out a little bit with mention of other changes and cultural issues outside of just 71, or should we start a brand new page Cannabis in Washington, D.C. and populate it from scratch, or what would be the best way? Goonsquad LCpl Mulvaney (talk) 23:17, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

I think the page should be renamed and within it include info about Initiative 71.Terrorist96 (talk) 23:21, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Yes, I think we need Cannabis in Washington, D.C., with a section and main page link to Initiative 71. The DC article should include other info related to culture, other legislation, advocacy group, etc. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 23:23, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Definitely two separate entries. One about the initiative, one about developments on marijuana in DC. I'll add some to the latter once its created. DC has few ballot initiatives, each is deserving of its own entry. Bangabandhu (talk) 04:51, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Cool, I've created Cannabis in Washington, D. C. by recycling some material from existing articles. Please feel free to expand and refine. Goonsquad LCpl Mulvaney (talk) 08:28, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Initiative 71. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140506051224/http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2014/04/23/pot-legalizers-hit-dc-streets-to-secure-november-ballot-spot to http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2014/04/23/pot-legalizers-hit-dc-streets-to-secure-november-ballot-spot

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:32, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Initiative 71. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130626133506/http://dcist.com/2012/04/as_part_of_plea_deal_capitol_hemp_t.php to http://dcist.com/2012/04/as_part_of_plea_deal_capitol_hemp_t.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170308024111/http://dcist.com/2014/07/marijuana_activists_turn_in_more_th.php to http://dcist.com/2014/07/marijuana_activists_turn_in_more_th.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:51, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Initiative 71. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150228020448/http://dcregs.dc.gov/Gateway/NoticeHome.aspx?NoticeID=4827610 to http://dcregs.dc.gov/Gateway/NoticeHome.aspx?NoticeID=4827610

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:48, 14 November 2017 (UTC)