Talk:2014 Singapore Grand Prix

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 6 external links on 2014 Singapore Grand Prix. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140903194410/http://www.formula1.com:80/races/in_detail/singapore_929/circuit_diagram.html to http://www.formula1.com/races/in_detail/singapore_929/circuit_diagram.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140727182829/http://www.fia.com:80/championship/fia-formula-1-world-championship/2014/calendar to http://www.fia.com/championship/fia-formula-1-world-championship/2014/calendar
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140727051712/http://www.formula1.com:80/news/headlines/2014/7/16141.html to http://www.formula1.com/news/headlines/2014/7/16141.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140920195310/http://www.formula1.com:80/results/season/2014/929/7394/ to http://www.formula1.com/results/season/2014/929/7394/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140921035347/http://www.formula1.com:80/results/season/2014/929/ to http://www.formula1.com/results/season/2014/929/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140922012839/http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/formula1/29296574 to http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/formula1/29296574

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:01, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:2014 Singapore Grand Prix/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs) 10:56, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

I'll review this. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 10:56, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

• for the change to tyres: too easy to parse as "the change to tyres from something else"; it took me a second to reparse it. How about "for the tyre change"?
  •  Done MWright96 (talk) 10:05, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
• Valtteri Bottas, Kevin Magnussen and Alonso had finished second at least once, and Jenson Button, Sergio Pérez and Felipe Massa had all finished third once: what's the significance of this? You don't list the drivers who won one or more of the earlier races; why list those who place?
  • Come to think about this issue, there is little significant value to this and have removed it from the article. MWright96 (talk) 10:05, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
• What is a "sector time"?
  • It is the time set by a particular driver in a certain part of the track. MWright96 (talk) 10:05, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
• and at the next race of the season in Japan, they would be prohibited: suggest "and decided that [or announced that] at the next race of...".
  • Replaced with the former. MWright96 (talk) 10:05, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
• Rosberg was only able to shift gears two at any one point: "shift gears two" looks incomplete.
  • Clarified. MWright96 (talk) 10:05, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
• to install soft compound tyres for a potential under cut: what is an "under cut"? You also have "undercut" a sentence later; whatever it means it should presumably be consistently given the space or not.
  • Undercut is known as overtaking in the pit lane for strategy reasons as stated per [1]. . Have made the spelling consistent. MWright96 (talk) 10:05, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
• Because of the length of time spent behind the safety car, the race would end under a two-hour time limit: I don't understand this -- surely the safety car would slow things down, not speed the race up?
  • Clarified. MWright96 (talk) 10:05, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

-- Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 01:14, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

• @Mike Christie: I have replied to your queries in the clearest way possible. MWright96 (talk) 10:05, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

  Looks good; promoting. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 10:43, 22 February 2018 (UTC)