Talk:2014 Monaco Grand Prix/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 13:55, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Review will follow shortly. Zwerg Nase (talk) 13:55, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

I just realized that I completely forgot about this review... will give it very soon, so sorry! Zwerg Nase (talk) 10:08, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

@Zwerg Nase: Still haven't heard anything regarding this review. Is everything alright? I understand fully if real life commitments are taking priority. MWright96 (talk) 20:20, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

I am unbelievable sorry this took so long, the past few weeks have been crazy RL-wise. Here we go now:

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

What needs to be done:

• Citation needed also for the statements in the first sentence of the Background section.
  • Have used the FIA preview reference to source the unreferenced statement. MWright96 (talk) 18:56, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
• You could mention why practice takes place on Thursday earlier and in more detail.
  • Added a note which says the reasoning behind the lack of Friday running. MWright96 (talk) 18:56, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
• Qualifying section: You should make it clearer that cars in Q3 are not allowed to change tyres for the race, so far, one could understand it in a way that they are not allowed to change during quali.
  • This should be somewhat more easier to understand. MWright96 (talk) 18:56, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
• You should give the year of the Japanese GP in which Bianchi sustained his fatal injuries.
  •  Done MWright96 (talk) 18:56, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
• I know this is not easy to source, but it would be great to point out that Whiting's suggestion of an additional minute of quali in the case of yellow flags did not come into effect.
  • Unfortunately, despite my very best efforts, i could not locate a source for your suggested statement. MWright96 (talk) 18:56, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Overall, a very well written article with just those minor points to adress. I have made some minor changes myself were I felt they were needed. I will try to do the other review today as well, tomorrow the latest. Zwerg Nase (talk) 12:44, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

• @Zwerg Nase: I have made changes to all but one of your suggestions. See my reply to the fifth suggestion. MWright96 (talk) 18:56, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Alrighty, I can pass this now. Congrats! Zwerg Nase (talk) 19:00, 26 November 2017 (UTC)