Talk:2014 Bahrain Grand Prix

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Zwerg Nase in topic GA Review

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on 2014 Bahrain Grand Prix. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:00, 26 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:2014 Bahrain Grand Prix/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 13:54, 12 October 2017 (UTC)Reply


Review will follow shortly. Zwerg Nase (talk) 13:54, 12 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

I just realized that I completely forgot about this review... will give it very soon, so sorry! Zwerg Nase (talk) 10:08, 8 November 2017 (UTC)Reply
@Zwerg Nase: Still haven't heard anything regarding this review. Is everything alright? I understand fully if real life commitments are taking priority. MWright96 (talk) 20:19, 24 November 2017 (UTC)Reply
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
  • Same issue as the Monaco article with wording of tyre choice in quali section.
  • He went off into the corner's run-off area onto the exit kerbs.. - it is unclear who "he" is in this context.
    • That would be Daniel Ricciardo who made that error. MWright96 (talk) 20:44, 26 November 2017 (UTC)Reply
  • Hülkenberg took advantage of Bottas sounds weird, I would recommend rephrasing that. He did not rape him after all...
    • Changed to Hülkenberg overtook Bottas
  • Having saved more fuel, he would have more horsepower available - I guess "he" is Rosberg, not Ricciardo??
  • Ricciardo locked his tyres going into turn one and narrowly avoided impacting the Ferrari - which Ferrari?
  • Maldonado was unable to react to Gutiérrez steering right into the first corner and hit his right-rear corner, rolling over twice in the air - this sounds like Maldonado rolled over, but it was Gutierrez
  • Pérez fended off a challenge from teammate Hülkenberg for third and defended from Vettel. Button fell to seventh after being passed by Vettel - the timeline seems off here. I would recommend just removing the second part of the first sentence which mentions Vettel, because it also sounds like Perez and not Hülkenberg was defending from him.
  • Ricciardo passed teammate Vettel for fourth - for fifth if I am not mistaken??

As you can see, mainly some inconsistency in the race report prose need to be sorted out here. Great work so far! Zwerg Nase (talk) 19:48, 26 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

  • @Zwerg Nase: I have implemented the changes that you have suggested and made some of my own edits to the prose. MWright96 (talk) 20:44, 26 November 2017 (UTC)Reply
Looks good! I can promote this to GA. Sorry again for the huge delay and congrats! Zwerg Nase (talk) 20:59, 26 November 2017 (UTC)Reply