Talk:2014–15 RB Leipzig season

This page shoud be edited

I noticed this page is not being edited since it has been created. apart from miner edits. please the owner of this article should work more on this and try to be updated. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.26.205.59 (talk) 06:59, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Vandalism

The page is being vandalized here: Categories, season template, infobox, review. The reason is: "It is not interesting to write about the 2nd league and RB Leipzig!"

In all other season articles of professional clubs they write all monthly short reviews. Anybody is disturbing there as user. If you have no interest than do not read and edite. --Nikebrand (talk) 19:48, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

The user User:MbahGondrong was only deleting my added things here. On the opposite, I never deleted his own contributions for respect. --hE STARTED TO CREATE OTHER BOXES AND LISTSNikebrand (talk) 20:40, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

The user proclaims that other monthly reviews for other clubs on Wikipedia are allowed and my never for Red Bull Leipzig. You can see the reviews here as template about 2013–14 FC Bayern Munich season#September. His reason: "...it is uninteresting to see it here about RB..:!", although it is a club within the second league of Germany, which has a huge interest. Every day, Red Bull makes headlines in the news. More than other "ideal clubs". --Nikebrand (talk) 20:52, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for finally willing to talk and discuss with me, actually I dont know where to start but here it goes. Firstly, I have NO problem at all with you adding monthly reviews, I really appreciate it, the problem is only the contents doesnt make any sense, as an example please explain what "Kimmich and Co. with full confidence. With Kicker (sports magazine) ace."? As I said many times before, please make your contents proper English that other people can understand. Maybe you understand what you want to write but I dont. Another thing, I have never say "...it is uninteresting to see it here about RB..:!" or "It is not interesting to write about the 2nd league and RB Leipzig!", on the other hand I am really interested in RB Leipzig. Second is about infobox. Please check other season pages like the Bayern München page that you always refer. The Co-Trainer, Motivation, Goalkeeping Coach, etc are not mentioned there, so why do you keep adding it? and what does "2. lap" means? Third and final thing is about friendlies or exhibition matches, see again the Bayern München page, is it written friendly or exhibition match there? I know you put some time to edit in Wikipedia but you have to do it properly and respond in a calm way. I have reported you again since you didnt want to discuss before. MbahGondrong (talk) 21:12, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2014–15 RB Leipzig season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140806012702/http://www.skrapid.at:80/9609+M574c7f54448.html to http://www.skrapid.at/9609+M574c7f54448.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:34, 27 September 2016 (UTC)