Talk:2014–15 Louisville Cardinals men's basketball team
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stub or not?
edit | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Is this article a stub?
IE is the tabular content to be ignored in assessing whether it is a stub?Rathfelder (talk) 20:32, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
I disagreed in that there is only two small paragraphs of prose, and that we build non-list articles out of prose, not tables. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 20:41, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
In my opinion, this would be considered a stub. I think that tables are generally ignored, for instance an article just made of tables could never get a rating of Stub, B, C, GA, etc. and would simply get a "list" rating. So in a way, that shows that tables arent really considered as content if you get what Im saying. Tortle (talk) 23:06, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
There are many articles consisting almost entirely of tables - election results and histories of sports events - which are not regarded as stubs. I don't understands what you mean by "rating of Stub, B, C, GA". Can you explain please?Rathfelder (talk) 08:27, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Different Wikiprojects have similar but different rating systems. For the college basketball project tables are not considered when rating an article. So since there are only a couple paragraphs with a basic description of the subject with few references this would qualify to me as a stub, with just a little more i could see this go to a start rating. Hope that gave you more of an understanding on the matter. Littlekelv (talk) 18:40, 25 December 2015 (UTC)