Talk:2013 Rugby League World Cup

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Fleets in topic Name

Draw out edit

Draw reported by the BBC today - so I've added it. RFL also has story of launch day. It confirms Cook Islands as 12th team. BBC story talks about qualifying teams and venues, but I haven't added that yet - don't know how subject to change that will be. Might do it in a minute. Stevebritgimp (talk) 23:28, 30 November 2010 (UTC) Actually no - someone else can do that if they like - an hour's practice hand-typing web cite links is more than enough for me. Also the fix with the dead link on the hosting decision was that the original linker hadn't just used the link to the story article number but had linked it as a news headline - so easily fixed. RFL launch story tells us less than BBC story does, i.e. intergroup games. Stevebritgimp (talk) 00:06, 1 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Double headers & attendances edit

All double headers at Wembley and Cardiff should only count has one crowd, not two. This is what the RLIF is doing and here is a link that proves that. http://www.rlwc2013.com/rugby-league-world-news/article/1274/world-cup-fever-creates-momentous — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adz2452 (talkcontribs) 06:33, 4 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Remove match details edit

I have noticed that the match details eg scorers etc are now appearing in the knockout section. these should be removed as these details are repeated in the knockout stage page. This page should merely be a summary. Anderch (talk) 02:05, 18 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Done --Bcp67 (talk) 08:06, 19 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

ranking edit

So what's with the ranking? Tournament ended last week, and still no ranking? Australia is #1 and New Zealand is #2 for sure. I'd say England is #3 and Fiji is #4, but the rest are not that easy. 82.141.67.208 (talk) 08:35, 2 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

If you can find an official source for any rankings then please go ahead and add them. Mattlore (talk) 08:45, 2 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
Well, there are rankings for the previous tournaments article without any source. Or at least none is given to that section. 82.141.67.208 (talk) 19:10, 2 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on 2013 Rugby League World Cup. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:35, 14 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Name edit

As with the 2021 Men's Rugby League World Cup, please can this article be renamed to "2013 Men's Rugby League World Cup" to allow the current title to be used in an article about the common elements and overall topic of the men's, women's, and festival of world cups. Mn1548 (talk) 14:58, 20 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

No, there is a primary topic. There is a primary topic in 2022, and in 2013 there was no reason for this move.Fleets (talk) 10:57, 21 October 2022 (UTC)Reply