Talk:2013 Paris–Nice

Latest comment: 8 years ago by MWright96 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:2013 Paris–Nice/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 08:19, 29 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Will review. MWright96 (talk) 08:19, 29 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Teams

edit
  • "Among the 184-rider start list was only one previous winner of the race, with 2000 race winner" - reptition of winner

Prologue

edit
  • Wikilink roleurs

Stage 1

edit
  • The last part of the first paragraph is not cited
  • "made the early breakaway from the field, and managed to e* xtend their advantage to the main field" - reptition of the word field
  • "an increase of pace in the peloton caused it to split apart," - I know what it split apart means but separate would be better

Stage 2

edit
  • "and the rest." would be better as and the rest of the field

Stage 3

edit
  • "The climb itself was seen as the pivotal point of the day's action, whether the sprinters could stay with the main field before the descent back into Brioude." - needs a reference

Stage 5

edit
  • "mainly second-category and third-category climbs compared to the first-category finishing climb" - better mainly second and third-category climbs compared to the first-category finishing climb
  • "some nine minutes in arrears of the overnight leader Garmin–Sharp's Andrew Talansky." - some nine minutes behind the overnight leader Garmin-Sharp's Andrew Talansky

Stage 6

edit
  • The last part of this section's first paragragh needs a citation
  • "With 64 points, Tschopp held a 40-point lead over Argos–Shimano's Thierry Hupond, with only ten points left to be taken at the finish of the following day's individual time trial at Col d'Èze." - ditto

Stage 7

edit
  • "Evaldas Šiškevičius of the Sojasun team was next to hold top spot," - first place
  • "Indeed, Quintana's time" - remove Indeed

References

edit

On hold until all the issues I have raised are checked. MWright96 (talk) 14:54, 29 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Should hopefully be resolved. Craig(talk) 16:14, 29 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
Yes all points have been resolved. Happy to promote to GA class. MWright96 (talk) 19:06, 29 August 2016 (UTC)Reply